Manus AI: The One-Tool-Does-Everything Dream

(That Almost Works)

Hey digital adventurers... so I’ve been testing Manus AI pretty heavily over the past few weeks and I need to talk to you about something that’s been on my mind

You know how I’ve been deep in this whole AI agents comparison thing right? Testing Claude, Zapier Agents, building my AI-orchestrated e-commerce system... I’ve been living in this space for months now

And here’s what kept hitting me... these tools are powerful but they’re also kind of a mess. You need Claude for reasoning. Zapier for integrations. Make.com for complex workflows. Different tools for different jobs and suddenly you’re orchestrating five platforms just to accomplish one business task

Then there’s Manus which is basically saying... what if we just made ONE tool that does everything?

That’s the pitch. That’s the promise. And honestly... it kind of delivers? But not without some pretty significant tradeoffs.

---

---

The One-Tool Dream Actually Means Something

Look when I wrote about the AI integration wars I talked about how every platform is trying to become this universal solution. But they’re all doing it through complexity... more protocols, more integrations, more configuration

Manus takes a completely different approach

You don’t choose which AI model to use. You don’t configure which tools are available(but you have to allow, which tool you want to integrate). You don’t set up integration chains or map data fields or think about API authentication

You just... tell it what you want. In plain language. And it figures out how to accomplish that using whatever combination of tools and approaches makes sense

For someone who’s been building automation workflows for years this feels almost too simple. Like where’s the catch?

Well... there IS a catch. Several actually. But first let me explain why this approach is genuinely valuable

The Computer Use Superpower (And Curse)

Here’s the thing that makes Manus different from Zapier Agents or most other automation tools...

Zapier has 8000 plus native integrations. Impressive. But if the tool you need isn’t in that list... you’re stuck

Manus uses what’s called “computer use” which basically means it can control a browser like a human would. Navigate websites. Fill forms. Extract data. Click buttons. If a human can do it through a web interface... Manus can attempt it

Think about what that means... you’re not limited to “does this have an API” or “is there a Zapier connector”. If it exists on the web Manus can probably interact with it

I needed pricing data from 30 competitor websites recently for my e-commerce experiments. Most don’t have APIs. Zapier couldn’t help. But Manus navigated to each site, extracted the info, compiled a spreadsheet, even did basic analysis

That’s genuinely powerful

But here’s the cost... this approach is SLOW and EXPENSIVE

When Zapier uses native API integrations tasks complete in seconds or maybe a minute. When Manus uses computer use for the same thing? Fifteen to twenty minutes. Sometimes longer

And the credit consumption... you can burn through your monthly allocation fast if you’re not careful

I ran the same workflow in both platforms. Zapier executed it in under two minutes using native tools. Manus took eighteen minutes and consumed enough credits that I definitely felt it in my usage balance

So why would anyone choose the slower more expensive option?

Scheduling Changes Everything

This is where Manus shows some actually clever product thinking...

They KNOW their computer use approach is slow. They KNOW it’s expensive. So they built scheduling as a core feature

And suddenly that completely changes the equation

If market research on 50 competitors takes around 30 minutes or so... I don’t want to sit there watching it work. But if I can schedule that overnight while I’m sleeping? And wake up to a completed report? Now we’re talking

I’ve been using this heavily. Product research runs overnight. Competitor analysis during lunch. Market data compilation while I’m in meetings

The computer doesn’t sleep right? So leverage that

This is probably why they’re offering double credits right now... they WANT you scheduling expensive tasks during off-peak hours. Helps with their infrastructure load and makes the slow execution feel less like a limitation

The Real Comparison Nobody’s Making

Okay so when does Manus actually make sense versus other tools?

Manus wins when:

• You need data from websites without APIs

• You can schedule work during downtime

• You want zero technical configuration

• Flexibility matters more than speed

• You’re doing one-off research rather than recurring operations

Other tools win when:

• Speed matters (Zapier Agents, Claude)

• Cost predictability is critical (basically anything else)

• You need reliable recurring workflows (Zapier, Make.com)

• You’re working with sensitive data (privacy concerns are real)

• You understand automation and want control (Claude Agent SDK)

For my AI automation work I’ve landed on using Manus as a specialized tool... not the foundation but a supplement for specific use cases where its flexibility shines

Market research? Manus overnight. Operational automation? Zapier. Strategic reasoning? Claude. Each tool doing what it does best

The Honest Limitations

Time to get real about where Manus falls short because I’m not here to sell you something...

The credit system is deliberately opaque. You can’t predict costs. I’ve had tasks use 900 credits. Similar tasks use 200 credits. Makes budgeting impossible

Reliability isn’t perfect. Tasks fail sometimes. Usually you can re-run but it’s frustrating when you’ve scheduled something overnight and wake up to a failure

Infrastructure struggles during peak times. “Service load” errors. Failed task launches. It’s getting better but it’s real

Privacy questions remain unanswered. Company structure is complex international with Chinese operational base. Where does your data actually live? Nobody knows for sure

Customer support is basically non-existent. You’re on your own figuring things out

It’s expensive. $199 per month for Pro with 19,900 credits. I calculated I need roughly this tier. That’s... a lot for a side project tool

Compare that to Zapier at $50 monthly or Claude API usage I can predict... Manus only makes financial sense if it saves you significant time on tasks you couldn’t do otherwise

The Non-Technical User Angle

Remember when I wrote about vibe coding and how AI is democratizing software development? Manus is doing something similar for automation

You don’t need to understand API authentication. Webhook configuration. Data mapping. Error handling logic. Conditional workflow branching

You just describe what you want in relatively clear terms

For someone running a small business who needs occasional complex research or data gathering... and doesn’t want to learn automation platforms... Manus removes like 90 percent of the technical complexity

That’s genuinely valuable even if it comes with tradeoffs

Compare this to setting up workflows in Make.com where you’re building the entire automation flow manually. Choosing triggers. Mapping data fields. Handling edge cases

Manus abstracts all that away. Makes decisions about how to accomplish what you asked for

Sometimes those decisions aren’t optimal but they usually work

And “usually works” is actually really good for this market segment

My Actual Framework

After months of testing here’s when Manus actually makes sense...

Use Manus when:

• Websites without APIs have data you need

• You can schedule overnight or during downtime

• Simplicity matters more than optimization

• You’re doing research rather than operations

• You’re willing to pay premium for convenience

Don’t use Manus when:

• You need real-time results

• Cost predictability matters

• You’re working with sensitive data

• You need reliable recurring workflows

• Speed is more important than flexibility

For my work... Manus has earned a spot in my toolkit. Not the centerpiece but a specialized tool I reach for when I need its unique flexibility

That’s probably the healthiest relationship with any AI tool... recognize what it’s good at, use it for those things, don’t force it into use cases where other tools work better

What This Really Means

The one-tool-does-everything dream is compelling. And Manus gets closer than most platforms I’ve tested

But it comes with real costs... literal financial costs, speed tradeoffs, reliability concerns, privacy questions

Is it worth it? Depends entirely on your specific needs

For occasional complex research tasks you can schedule overnight... where you need flexibility more than speed... and you’re not working with sensitive data... yeah Manus might be perfect

For production business systems or anything time-sensitive or recurring operations... probably not

The AI agent landscape is still evolving fast. What feels limiting today might be solved next month

But right now... Manus represents probably the most accessible “do everything” agent for non-technical users who want automation without drowning in configuration

That’s valuable even if it’s not perfect

And honestly... nothing in this space is perfect yet. We’re all still figuring this out together

---

PS. How do you rate today’s email? Leave a comment or “❤️” if you liked the article - I always value your comments and insights, and it also gives me a better position in the Substack network.